Spike Count Reliability

See Neuron (2000) paper: Abstract
LGN responses are highly reliable. One aspect of this is the reproducible number of spikes fired in response to a given stimulus. The figure shows an LGN cell's responses to 1024 repeats of the same black-and-white flickering stimulus (click to enlarge figure). The spike count in any given epoch of the LGN response is reliable, with a trial-to-trial variance much less than the mean (ratio 0.2, if you count spikes in 200 msec windows). For comparison, a random Poisson sequence of events, like radioactive decay, always has a variance equal to the mean (ratio of 1).

In the LGN and other visual neurons, refractoriness can explain spike-count reliability. The figure below illustrates this with another LGN cell. When the firing rate reaches a peak (a), the variability or Fano Factor is lowest (b). The same data are replotted in (c) as the variance vs. the mean count for each 1msec time bin. As the count gets higher, the data get farther from the Poisson prediction (diagonal). The cell can be modeled as a Poisson process with a refractory period imposed. The model is fit to the observed firing rate (a) and refractoriness, but it accounts for how variability changes with firing rate as well (red lines in a and b).


Back to Pam Reinagel's home page
Back to Reinagel Lab